![]() ![]() Again, I’m not sure if that’s a compliment. I won’t front like I didn’t enjoy some elements of the film, but as a whole? It felt like I was watching a film based on what worked in a number of superhero flicks over the last few years. That said, this film is easily the second or third best DC film of the modern era.not sure how much of a compliment that is, but this is where we’re at. People didn’t even clap during the Thor: Ragnarok screening I attended, and that film was actually lit! I’m not sure WHY there was a round of applause, which makes me wonder what the mix of attendees in the audience was. When the film ended, there was a round of applause. The screening I went to was at 10 in the morning, and while I know there was a lot of press in the building, I’m not sure if it was a mixture of people. How the hell would he handle this film, which DC needs to win big during this time of flux? About as well as you’d expect a DC film in 2018 not titled Wonder Woman to fair.įrazier and myself saw the film yesterday and then compared notes about DC’s latest, um, epic. Sure, he has one Fast & Furious film under his belt, but he’s made his Hollywood bones with the likes of The Conjuring and Insidious franchises. James Wan, who made his directorial debut with the first Saw film (which he also wrote), was seen as an interesting choice to direct this project. It’s been damn near eighty years since the hero who’s major power is best described as “talking to fish” hit the magazine stands, and now Jason Momoa is ushering in a new era for Aquaman, under a DC regime that’s been more miss than hit. ![]() It’s still kind of insane to think that comic book characters like Aquaman are only just getting their official solo film adaptations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |